Showing posts with label AFP corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AFP corruption. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

We must have justice and punish criminals



By: 
r

 0share4 4
The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO), the government agency that gives hundreds of millions of pesos to lotto and sweepstakes winners, and financial help every day to hundreds of poor people, has not paid P5 billion in taxes to the government? Believe it or not, it is true. No less than PCSO Chairperson Margarita Juico has confirmed that the state lottery firm is being dunned P3.6 billion in unpaid taxes from 2007 to 2009, plus interests, surcharges and penalties so that the total may go up to P5 billion.
What happened? The PCSO people forgot? Or they mistakenly thought that being a government agency giving out financial help, the PCSO is exempt from paying taxes? Or is the PCSO just spending more than it earns so that no money is left for taxes? Which is which?
The PCSO is not the first state agency to have problems with back taxes. Many state agencies, because they are government, think it is all right not to pay taxes to the government. From government to government, they say. It is taking money from one pocket and putting it into another, they say.
But the PCSO case is different. It is disheartening to know from an off-the-record revelation that the PCSO was not able to pay the right taxes because it had to remit funds for the use of the powers-that-be, in this case, members of the Arroyo administration.
Congress should investigate the claim that instead of using money to pay its taxes, the
PCSO diverted funds to the discretionary fund of then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo shortly before the 2010 elections.
A congressional investigation is necessary because even Bureau of Internal Revenue Commissioner Kim Henares said that it was not likely that the tax agency would start legal action against former PCSO officials because the funds involve only unpaid documentary stamp taxes.
Henares said her agency can prosecute local officials only for not remitting taxes withheld from employees because that constitutes estafa. That is not the case with unpaid documentary stamp taxes.
The worst that the BIR can do, she said, is to seize and liquidate PCSO assets, but that is not practical because the state charity agency may not be able to deliver its services to the needy.
The situation is much like the case of former Chairman Efraim Genuino of the Philippine Gaming and Amusement Corp. (Pagcor), and two of his children. The difference is that the government apparently has enough evidence against the Genuinos in the corruption charges the Genuinos deny.
The cases stem from the use of Pagcor funds amounting to P26.7 million to finance the filming of the movie “Baler,” which was co-produced by a firm where Genuino’s son was executive producer. The other case is the alleged diversion of P24 million representing the stipends of Philippine swimming athletes.
Genuino is also accused of using P186 million in Pagcor funds to finance an anti-drug campaign of a foundation headed by his daughter Sheryl. Pagcor rice donations were also allegedly distributed during the campaign rallies of Genuino’s two sons. In fairness to the Genuino family, it denies the allegations.
The cases against the Genuinos appear to be strong enough to persuade the court to issue hold-departure orders against them, but that is not the case with the PCSO raps.
The irony is that even if congressional investigators manage to persuade the court that the
PCSO did divert funds to GMA’s discretionary fund, the PCSO will be liable only for its back taxes, and the truth will still be hidden by the accounting veil of a presidential discretionary fund.
But even then, that does not mean we should surrender and take the lazy path of “letting bygones be bygones.”
Pagcor and PCSO are among the government’s biggest cash cows, where one doesn’t even have to wait for a budget release order to get his hands on piles of cash. But that money should have gone to schools and hospitals, and the fact that it was used for personal benefit should be enough reason for national outrage.
One of the reasons the Philippine government has become so corrupt during and after the Marcos administration is that thieves are given the impression that Filipinos are a forgiving people and soon forget crimes.
That is one of the serious challenges to the Aquino administration. It is the government’s task to prove that crime does not pay and criminals are prosecuted.
That was perhaps the message the country wanted to deliver when it imprisoned former President Joseph Estrada (unfairly, he claims). For six years, we jailed a widely popular president in what was then the second strongest indication of our indignation against official corruption.
The people ousted him, jailed him and replaced him with someone who was supposed to be his antithesis. Now we know that we were wrong. We were shortchanged and had to endure for 10 years a president who was much worse.
Of course there are those who became filthy rich beyond their wildest dreams. One example is retired Maj. Gen. Carlos Garcia (ironically the namesake of a former president known for his humility and honesty) who managed to amass ill-gotten wealth that made even the Old Rich dizzy. He might even escape prosecution because he cut a questionable deal that was approved by the previous administration.
Even his conviction in a court martial was left unsigned by GMA so he would not have to be imprisoned. When the authorities finally arrived to arrest him, he supposedly told them: “Bakit n’yo ginagawa ito sa akin (Why are you doing this to me)?”
Critics say that the Aquino administration is being vindictive for bringing out the truth that was hidden from the people for 10 years. But that is justice, criminals must be punished, and the people deserve no less.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Gold mine’ in Marcos safe



By 
Philippine Daily Inquirer
(First of a series)
Sen. Joker Arroyo remembers the night US helicopters airlifted the dictator Ferdinand Marcos, his family and close associates to exile in Hawaii as howling mobs stormed Malacañang on Feb. 25, 1986.
Arroyo then was one of the closest aides of Corazon Aquino, who was installed as President earlier in the morning at the close of a four-day People Power Revolution that ended the 20-year Marcos rule. Arroyo had been directed to secure the Palace.
With him were Teddy Boy Locsin, a lawyer who would later join the Aquino administration, anti-Marcos activist Potenciano “Chito” Roque, and TV talk show host Maan Hontiveros, who just happened to tag along.
“Teddy Boy was so engrossed in the library of Marcos,” Arroyo says. “Chito Roque was looking at the guns.” He says he later learned that Roque had taken documents from the Marcos room.
Roque was a member of the August 21 Movement, or Atom, formed following the assassination of the new President’s husband, the opposition leader Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino, in 1983.
In a sworn statement, Roque said he had found a safe in a cabinet, opened it using the combination pasted on the door and saw many documents, including Swiss bank accounts, stock certificates and voting trust agreements.
Arroyo says Roque later handed him a black bag containing the documents. “He told me, ‘What will I do with this?’” Arroyo recalls. “So, I got it. I myself treated it just like another bag.”
The bag stayed for several days in the office of Arroyo at the Malacañang Guest House. He later mentioned it to former Sen. Jovito Salonga, who examined the documents and subsequently reported to Aquino.
“It was a gold mine. That’s what it was,” Arroyo says. “Nobody knew about the ill-gotten wealth. What all of us was fighting for was to regain our liberties. We never realized the gravity of the corruption because we were so bothered by the human rights violations.”
Sheer necessity
Salonga drafted Aquino’s first executive order, which was issued on Feb. 28 signed by the President and Arroyo, who had been named executive secretary. The order created the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) headed by Salonga to investigate and recover assets plundered by Marcos, his family and cronies.
For the revolutionary government declared by Aquino, the recovery of illegally amassed assets from Marcos and his wife Imelda, relatives and friends was not only a question of simple justice, but also sheer necessity.
The national treasury was bare.
When Marcos was elected President in 1965, the nation’s foreign debt totaled $600 million. It reached $2 billion in 1972 when martial law was declared and ballooned to $26 billion at the end of his rule. Meanwhile, estimates of the illegal assets of Marcos and his cronies ranged from $5 billion to $10 billion.
The papers uncovered in the vault revealed Marcos dummies in the country’s largest corporations and monies handed out by the Marcoses and then Social Secretary Fe Gimenez to various people.
Mortal enemy
What caught Aquino’s eye, according to Arroyo, were the papers pertaining to her cousin Eduardo “Danding” Cojuangco and his shares of stocks in San Miguel Corp. (SMC), brewers of one of the world’s renowned beers and one of the country’s largest conglomerates.
Cojuangco, who fled with Marcos to Hawaii on the night of Feb. 25, 1986, was among the suspects in the Ninoy Aquino assassination. No case was ever brought against him in the murder case, but he was regarded at the time by Aquino as a “mortal enemy,” Arroyo says.
Marcos owned shares?
There were also negotiable instruments duly endorsed; stock certificates in blank, among many others, in Primavera Farms Inc., Meadow Lark Plantation Inc. and Silver Leaf Plantation, which owned 8,138,440 SMC shares; and, voting rights agreements in favor of Cojuangco.
Lawyers said the instruments found in Marcos’ vault meant the dictator owned or shared with Cojuangco ownership of the SMC shares.
Primavera Farms, Meadow Lark and Silver Leaf were among several dozen so-called “Cojuangco companies” sequestered between April and May 1986 as state lawyers moved swiftly to pursue Aquino’s orders to seize illegally acquired assets during 14 years of martial law.
Not one jailed
The PCGG said that as of January, it had recovered P93 billion in stashed bank accounts and proceeds of sales of assets by the Marcoses and their allies, including prime properties in New York.
But not one of them has ever been jailed for plunder.
Some documents were used by then US District Attorney Rudolph Giuliani, later New York City mayor, in indicting Marcos, Imelda and Saudi Arabian arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi in October 1988 in a $300-million racketeering scheme for embezzling Philippine public funds to buy the Manhattan properties.
Marcos, the highest-ranking foreign government official ever indicted in the United States under a law crafted to go against the Mafia, died 11 months later before the case was resolved.
Imelda, defended by the flamboyant Gerry Spence, one of the best lawyers in America, put on a show worthy of a Broadway spectacle that riveted New York, walking on her knees in St. Patrick’s Cathedral, getting loyalists to march in the streets, fingering her rosary, sobbing, coughing blood during the trial.
In spite of massive evidence, a 12-member jury, the majority with only a high school education, all clueless about the Philippines, acquitted Imelda, naively buying her tearful testimony that she had never written a check as the dictator’s spouse.
Frustrated at every turn
In the attempt to recover the coconut levy funds used in 1983 to purchase SMC shares, state lawyers, as the New York attorneys experienced, faced a phalanx from the nation’s top law firms, and were frustrated at every turn.
Documents found in the Marcos vault detailed funding arrangements involving 14 holding companies, oil mills and a trading monopoly to acquire and amortize SMC shares using loans from state-owned United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB), depositary of the coconut levy, managed by Cojuangco.
The 14 companies were set up under the Coconut Industry Investment Fund (CIIF) in an elaborate scheme, government lawyers said, conjured for Cojuangco by legal eagles in Accra, the premier law firm in the land, to defraud the farmers.
A young Accra lawyer at the time recalled a colleague who came up with a naughty idea to name the companies after the firms’ associates. That’s why some of them bore the initials of Senators Edgardo Angara, Franklin Drilon and the late Raul Roco. These people said they were simply nominees and had nothing to do with the activity.
Barbarians at the gate
Court records show that these CIIF companies had acquired P1.650 billion worth of SMC shares and Cojuangco another block of shares worth P374 million—all purportedly financed, either directly or indirectly, from loans from UCPB and the state oil companies. The amount totaled P2 billion.
The portfolio was acquired as the SMC management was battling barbarians at the gate seeking a piece of the action in this beer-guzzling nation, ostensibly with the blessings of Malacañang. It comprised 51 percent of the SMC shares—31 percent designated in court litigation as CIIF shares, and the other 20 percent tagged as the Cojuangco shares.
The government contended that the loans were repaid using levy funds or earnings from the state-owned oil mills.
In 2001, a new solicitor general, Simeon Marcelo, a private prosecutor in the impeachment trial of President Joseph Estrada who was ousted earlier that year, stood before a hushed Supreme Court ranged against the best lawyers money could buy to argue the case. At issue then were the voting rights of the sequestered CIIF shares in UCPB.
Consumed by the justness of his cause, Marcelo passionately argued that the CIIF shares were acquired with public funds and therefore should be considered public and returned to the farmers.
Accepting his argument, the Supreme Court ruled coconut levies were “prima facie” public funds, that these came from the pockets of the coconut farmers as tax deposited in UCPB.
The 2001 ruling on the UCPB shares ruling gave hope to the farmers, only to be dashed on April 12 this year, when the court ruled that the other contested block of shares under Cojuangco’s name belonged to him. It held that the government had failed to prove its case, that Cojuangco was not a Marcos crony, in what a dissenting justice described as the “biggest joke to hit the century.”
As the case dragged on, the question that lingered was why the government had not worked out a compromise on the case and many others involving alleged plundered wealth.
Deathbed plea
Before the dictator died in Hawaii on Sept. 28, 1989, Imelda called Salvador Laurel, Aquino’s estranged Vice President. She was sobbing, pleading with him to come and see the dying Marcos.
“He wanted me to deliver a message to Cory,” Laurel was quoted by his wife Celia in her book titled “Doy Laurel,” written after her husband died in 2004.
“Please tell Mrs. Aquino to stop sending her relatives. They are proposing so many things. All I want is to die in my country. Tell her to let me come home. I will turn over 90 percent of all my worldly possession to our people. I will ask only 10 percent for my family. That is much better than what her relatives are asking,” Laurel quoted Marcos as telling him.
Cory Aquino refused to see Laurel, a former senator who had organized the opposition during the martial law years, gave up his own lifelong ambition to become president to rally the anti-Marcos forces behind the widow of his boyhood friend in the snap election of 1986 that preceded the revolution. Instead, she urged Laurel to reveal the Marcos message to the public. He refused. He said he was only the messenger.
To this day, most of Marcos’ reported billions of dollars of plundered assets have been largely untouched. Allegations of corruption against him have never been proven in court.
In 1998, Imelda boasted that the Marcoses “practically own everything” in the Philippines—businesses ranging from telecommunications to real estate, to newspapers. She vowed to recover assets worth P500 billion from those holding them in the name of the family. A swank mall still plays her favorite song, “Dahil sa iyo,” whenever she comes to shop.
Mother of all scams
Cojuangco, now 75, returned from exile in November 1991—seven months before the end of Cory’s term. In a statement, he declared that in his absence and with much publicity his properties were seized and he had been accused of serious crimes against the state.
“Let me make clear that I have not stolen or taken any property from the government or anybody else in violation of law, in breach of any moral rule or to the damage of our country and people,” he said. He denounced the “frivolity and baselessness of the charges” against him and vowed he would vindicate himself in courts.
Cojuangco went on to rebuild his political and business interests. He formed his own political party, the Nationalist People’s Coalition, and used it in an unsuccessful bid to contest the presidential election of 1992. Although he lost, his party is regarded as one of the most influential in the nation and he himself is considered a sort of a “king maker.” Now chair and CEO of SMC, he was one of his nephew Benigno Aquino III’s major contributors in the May 2010 presidential elections.
The Supreme Court decision of April 12—affirmed on Tuesday when it threw out a motion for reconsideration filed by lawyers on behalf of the farmers and the PCGG—is regarded as one of the most important legal victories the business tycoon has scored in his attempt at redemption.
“It is a triumph for the Marcoses and Cojuangco,” Romeo C. Royandoyan, executive director of the nonprofit Philippine Center for Rural Development, says of the ruling. “It is also the legitimization of the mother of all scams.”

When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your retirement and real estate needs.

Avail of the opportunity to own a condominium unit in Cebu City for only P12,000.00/month with its own parking lot. Hurry while the supply of units last. Just call the Tel. Nos. shown below.
Tel. Nos. (032)555-8464/09164422611/09173378637
(Second part: Souvenirs of deception)