VOTING 7-6 with two justices abstaining, the Supreme Court has reversed itself anew in the controversial case of 16 cityhood laws, this time reinstating its 2008 decision that declared these laws unconstitutional. In a 16-page decision penned by Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, the Court said that a tie-vote on the second motion for reconsideration cannot reverse the Nov. 18, 2008, decision of the high tribunal on the case. Aside from Carpio, those who voted in favor of reinstating the 2008 decision were Justices Conchita Carpio-Morales, Arturo Brion, Diosdado Peralta, Martin Villarama Jr., Jose Mendoza and Maria Lourdes Sereno. Dissenter Justice Presbitero Velasco Jr., who penned the 2009 ruling that reversed the 2008 decision, wrote a dissenting opinion. He was joined by Chief Justice Renato Corona and Justices Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, Lucas Bersamin, Roberto Abad and Jose Perez. Those who took no part in the voting were Justices Antonio Nachura and Mariano del Castillo. The Nov. 18, 2008, decision declared the cityhood laws unconstitutional and denied a March 31, 2009, motion for reconsideration filed by the Commission on Elections (Comelec). Today's activists learn lessons of failed cityhood drives.(REAL ESTATE QUARTERLY TOMORROW'S EAST L.A.): An article from: Los Angeles Business Journal “These priority majority actions of the court en banc can only be overruled by a new majority vote, not a tie-vote because a tie-vote cannot overrule a prior affirmative action,” the high court said in its latest decision, promulgated on Aug. 24. Tedious The Supreme Court, by a split-vote of 6-6, denied a second motion for reconsideration on April 28, 2009. Subsequently, the November 2008 ruling became final and executory and recorded in the Book of Entries of Judgement on May 21, 2009. “However, shortly thereafter, it was realized that there were still pending unresolved motions. Hence, in the resolution of pending motions, the court, on Dec. 21, 2009, reversed its Nov. 18, 2008, decision,” the Supreme Court said in a press statement Friday. The majority said the denial of the second motion for reconsideration by a split vote, “inevitably rendered the [Nov. 18, 2008] decision final.” Declared as unconstitutional were the city status of Baybay in Leyte, Bogo in Cebu, Catbalogan in Samar, Tandag in Surigao del Sur, Lamitan in Basilan, Borongan in Samar, Tayabas in Quezon, Tabuk in Kalinga, Bayugan in Agusan del Sur, Batac in Ilocos Norte, Mati in Davao Oriental, Guihulngan in Negros Oriental, Cabadbaran in Agusan del Norte, El Salvador in Misamis Oriental, Carcar in Cebu and Naga in Cebu. No other interpretation In reaffirming the original decision of the Supreme Court, the justices reiterated that the Constitution “expressly provides that no city shall be created except in accordance with the criteria established in the local government code.” “This provision can only be interpreted in one way,” said the latest Supreme Court decision. “Clearly, the cityhood laws contravene the letter and intent of … the Constitution,” it said. The justices also said Congress “exceeded and abused its law-making power.” In his dissenting opinion, however, Velasco said he found the decision “rather startling.” Velasco insisted that exemptions from requirements of cityhood are allowed by the Constitution. Mayors thankful Officers of the League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP) on Friday hailed the Supreme Court decision. “The League of Cities of the Philippines is thankful to the members of the Supreme Court who opted to observe the Constitution, judicial precedents and the law concerning conversion of municipalities into cities,” City of San Fernando Mayor Oscar Rodriguez, the LCP president, said. “The last bulwark of democracy has spoken,” said Angeles City Mayor Edgardo Pamintuan, the LCP public relations officer. With a report from Jun Malig, Inquirer Central Luzon |
By JACKY LYNNE A. OIGA
August 7, 2010, 9:33am
Sensational Singapore (Photo by RONALD JAYME)
Singapore, thanks to its grandiose architectures, chic shopping centers, and fascinating tourist attractions, has become a favorite travel destination for opulent Filipinos who can afford to spend some extra cash in the bustling Lion City. As a matter of fact, according to Singapore Airlines (SIA) General Manager to the Philippines, Andrew Budiman, Filipinos are one of the top visitors to Singapore.
“There’s a high demand for flights to Singapore from the Philippines. When several airlines were cutting flights last year, we were busy adding flights. There’s a significant number of business and leisure travelers flying to Singapore every day,” said Budiman.
Not only does SIA have daily flights from Manila and from Singapore, passengers from Cebu and Davao will also benefit from SilkAirs’, SIA’s regional full-service carrier, daily flights from Cebu and four weekly flights from Davao.
“We were actually the first international airline that serviced scheduled flights from Cebu back in 1989. And by October 2010, services to Cebu and Davao will be increased to eight times and five times weekly, respectively,” said SIA marketing communication and services manager Rita Dy.
Among the most visited tourist attractions for the Filipino market are: the Sentosa Island, Night Safari, the newly opened Universal Studios, as well as last year’s much talked about F1 Grand Prix. But aside from these Singapore favorites, Budiman added that Kathmandu, Nepal; Penang, Malaysia; and Chiang Mai, Thailand are also among the emerging cultural destinations for Filipinos.
“As Filipinos travelers become more affluent, they tend to be more interested in cultural tours and extreme adventure destinations around Asia,” Budiman said. Other exciting and exotic destinations in SilkAir’s regional network include: Chengdu, China; Chennai, India; Surabaya, Indonesia; and Yangon, Myanmar.
However, there’s a common notion that SIA and SilkAir are rather expensive carriers. Dy stressed that the slight price difference is negligible for the kind of service they offer. “We want to give our passengers value for their money. We have also become more competitive in terms of ticket fares and tour packages. We also make sure to advertise all inclusive fares, no hidden charges and no plus-plus, so if you look at ticket prices closely, we’re sometimes cheaper than other airlines.”
To provide more reasons to visit Singapore, SIA has teamed up with Changi Airport Group (CAG) and Singapore Tourism Board (STB) to offer new value-packed holiday packages. Under a just-signed Memorandum of Understanding, the three partners will be working closely on a range of advertising and other joint activities worldwide to promote tourism to Singapore.
The global tie-up will give tourists the opportunity to visit new places of interest in Singapore, and savour what the multicultural food paradise has to offer through the Singapore Stopover Holiday packages priced from as low as US$33 per person on twin-share basis for the first night.
When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your real estate and retirement needs.
When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your real estate and retirement needs.
For more information log on to www.singaporeair.com.