Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Visions and revisions


By: 

Philippine Daily Inquirer

P-noy isn’t making things worse, economically or otherwise, but he’s missing a lot of chances to make things better. While it’s true enough that “’pag walang corrupt, walang mahirap” (where there are no plunderers, there are no paupers), it’s even truer that pag walang pagbabago, walang saklolo(where there is no transformation, there is no salvation).
Arguably, a government that’s not corrupt, or less so than the previous one, is already an epic change. A government that you trust, or do not distrust as badly as the previous one, is already an epic change. But it is not enough. What the public expects from the P-Noy government is even more epic, simply because what it did to bring it to power was just as epic. It was not the brilliance of those who are currently in power that brought them to power, or heaven forbid their campaign managers. It was the brilliance of the people. They were the ones who had the eyes to see P-Noy was “the one,” they were the ones who had the heart, or balls, to make him so.
They do not just expect him to be virtuous, they expect him to be courageous. They do not just expect him to do things differently, they expect him to do things heroically.
Diverting a huge portion of the budget to doles isn’t doing things heroically, even if it’s doing things differently. At the very least that is so because it raises suspicions of dividing spoils to favor favorites, or worse of allowing those same favorites to campaign this early for 2013. Doles are the best way to buy votes. But doles do not check joblessness, they do not even check poverty. Not in the long run, not even in the short run.
At the very most that is so because the same money could have been spent for emergency employment. That is a time-honored way of getting out of the rut of exceedingly bad times, or since we’ve been in that perpetual state anyway at least of checking worsening poverty. That was what Franklin Roosevelt did during the Great Depression. He opened up millions of emergency jobs in public works, quite apart from giving relief to the unemployed. Spending for public works practically disappeared during the last few years of Gloria’s rule.
Just as well, you want to subsidize, subsidize agriculture. Or more specifically, subsidize the farmers.
Agriculture doesn’t just provide food for the table, it provides employment—or self-employment, or livelihood—for most Filipinos. The neglect—no, abandonment—of agriculture is one of the biggest sources of poverty in this country. Who wants to farm now? Even the rice terraces have gone to pot, and I don’t mean marijuana (though I could be wrong), for lack of people wanting to till land anymore. Farming brings nothing. With importation being regarded as the cheapest way to get rice (it is not in the long run), the Arroyo government relegated farmers to the status of beggars.
Without seeds, fertilizer, insecticide, irrigation, and whatever else a farmer needs to grow things, and having a rice cartel ripping them off on the price of their harvest after they have paid more than their due to usurers, what else is left? They can’t even afford to buy their own rice. The last thing farmers want is for their children to follow in their muddy footsteps. The first is to go abroad and become OFWs. I’ve heard a lot of comments recently about today being the best time to try to attract investors in agriculture. I’m all for it. But first invest in the farmers. No farmers, no agriculture. No farming, no employment.
Food security, or food sovereignty as it is called now, should be on top of the list. It is so even in countries that can afford to import food a hundred times over. It is so in the United States, it is so in Europe, it is so in Japan. These are countries that heavily subsidize their agriculture, these are countries that heavily protect their agriculture, WTO notwithstanding. We’d be fools not to do so. Especially in our case—a fact that cannot be sufficiently belabored—where farming doesn’t just put food on the table but puts work in the hands of most Filipinos.
And finally, I cannot for the life of me understand why this government isn’t using People Power to power the country to the 21st century. People Power doesn’t just mean toppling governments, it can also mean building a nation. Proof of it is the very existence of this government itself. This is a government that came to power on an Edsa masquerading as an election. This is a government that came to power on the strength of People Power masquerading as voters. People Power is the one awesome weapon P-Noy has that his predecessor did not have. It is the one awesome weapon P-Noy has that his predecessor strove desperately to find but could not.
But he’s not using it.
Efren PeƱaflorida has already shown whole new vistas of what is possible if you can harness the spirit of voluntarism and make it a partner in governance. The “kariton classroom” is one of the most inspired inventions in this country, and I don’t know why it cannot be made to sprout like mushrooms by the Department of Education and other private groups. The “kariton classroom” points the way out of the rut and how to get there. That is by educating the country, that is by teaching the masa to read and write, that is by bringing the light of learning to the poorest of the poor. And that is by bringing learning to them and not by forcing them to go to it. That is the only way you can stop ignorance, that is the only way you can stop joblessness, that is the only way you can stop poverty. The enlightened does not ask, “What job can I find today?” The enlightened asks, “What work can I do today?”
No, this government isn’t making things so much worse, it’s just not making things so much better. As it should.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

US economy benefits much from Filipino immigrants

By Jun Burgos


MANILA, Philippines—The United States economy has been greatly helped by Filipino immigration, or the entry of our countrymen into that country for the purpose of permanent residence and work there.

This can be deduced from a recent study which revealed that the US economy benefitted from immigration both in times of recession and in times of economic expansion.

The study was released by Migration Policy Institute (MPI), an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think-tank based in Washington DC analyzing the movement of people worldwide.

Entitled “The Impact of Immigrants in Recession and Economic Expansion,” it was conducted by economist Giovanni Peri, associate professor in the Department of Economics at the University of California, Davis (UC-Davis), a public research university located in Davis, California and one of 10 campuses in the University of California system.


According to the study, “there is broad consensus among economists that immigration has a small but positive impact on the average income of Americans over the long term. But far less analysis has been done on the impact of immigrants on the labor market in the shorter term, particularly when viewed through the lens of the recession and its lingering labor market effects.”

The author asserted that immigration “unambiguously improves US employment, productivity, and income.”

The study, examining the short- and long-run impacts of immigration on average and over the business cycle of growth and contraction, underscored the positive contribution of immigration to US economy, but stressed that “it also involves some short-term adjustments (such as worker retraining or adoption of new technology).”

Here are some of the findings in the study:

* “Immigrants do not reduce native employment rates over the long run (10 years), while increasing productivity and average income for native-born workers. Immigration to the United States over the 1990-2006 period can be credited with a 2.9-percent increase in real wages for the average US worker.
* The adjustment process, however, is not immediate. When immigration occurs during a downturn, the economy does not appear to respond as quickly as it would during economic expansions and there is evidence of modest negative impacts on employment and average income in the short run. These impacts dissipate over periods of up to seven years.

* During periods of economic growth, by contrast, new immigration creates jobs in sufficient numbers to leave native employment unharmed even in the short run. This holds true even for less-educated workers. Immigration during economic expansions has no measurable, short-term negative effect on income per worker.”

Peri said, “Adjustments to employment, productivity, and income are more difficult during downturns. This suggests that the United States would benefit most from an immigration system that better adjusts to economic conditions, allowing legal immigrant inflows to be more responsive to the economic cycle.”

He suggests “allowing employers’ demand for work visas to play a stronger role in determining the number of visas issued annually, and that a share of the visas be allocated to less-skilled workers, particularly those who perform primarily manual jobs that native workers increasingly are much less interested in filling.”

MPI president Demetrios Papademetriou added, “This report offers further evidence yet of the need for the immigration system to become significantly more responsive to the US economy’s constantly evolving labor market needs, so that the benefits of immigration can be captured more fully and any negative effects neutralized.
Establishing an independent executive-branch agency that would make regular recommendations to the President and Congress for adjusting employment-based immigration levels would inject a greatly needed degree of flexibility into the current rigid immigration system.”

The study didn’t mention it, but Filipinos are a big part of the immigrants contributing tremendously to the US economy.

Based on the online Wikipedia’s most recent entry on “Filipino Americans,” there were approximately four million FilAms, or Americans with Filipino ancestry, in the US in 2007, comprising some 1.5 percent of the United States population.

According to data from the 2006 American Community Survey (ACS) of the US Census Bureau, “the number of Filipino immigrants in the United States tripled between 1980 and 2006, from 501,440 to 1.6 million, making them the second largest immigrant group in the United States after Mexican immigrants and ahead of the Chinese, Indian, and Vietnamese foreign born.”

It is understandably difficult to have an account of the exact number of Filipino immigrants to the US, owing to the decision of some, especially the “tago ng tago, or TNTs” not to participate in census surveys.

But it is safe to say that the millions of Filipinos who have immigrated to the US have indeed contributed much to that country’s economy.

It may be just fitting for the US government to consider a little relaxing of its immigration requirements.